<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Site redesign: Alamy.com</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.planet-anarky.co.uk/index.php/2010/01/22/site-redesign-alamy-com/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.planet-anarky.co.uk/index.php/2010/01/22/site-redesign-alamy-com/</link>
	<description>George Rosier&#039;s portfolio &#38; blog site</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 30 Dec 2011 11:26:16 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
<meta name="generator" content="deStyle 0.9.2" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Vincent Roman</title>
		<link>http://www.planet-anarky.co.uk/index.php/2010/01/22/site-redesign-alamy-com/comment-page-1/#comment-406</link>
		<dc:creator>Vincent Roman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Feb 2010 02:21:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.planet-anarky.co.uk/?p=605#comment-406</guid>
		<description>Nice one, like the design, but as you say this idea of the competition is already sick, let alone forcing people to use stock imagery that they have to buy from the site.  I don&#039;t see why all these stock photo companies think it is okay to act in such a dubious manner.  As if Getty Images didnt give them a bad enough rep as it is.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice one, like the design, but as you say this idea of the competition is already sick, let alone forcing people to use stock imagery that they have to buy from the site.  I don&#8217;t see why all these stock photo companies think it is okay to act in such a dubious manner.  As if Getty Images didnt give them a bad enough rep as it is.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

