Posts Tagged ‘ spam

Unsubscribing from internal emails

Bit of a rant coming up – but one with a point that, I hope, will stimulate some debate.

I recently received a stack of internal comms emails. Since Monday, I’ve received 6 messages on various topics that are completely irrelevant to me and only serve to clutter my already-over-its-size-limit inbox (as the mailbox administrator continually takes pleasure in telling me).

One could argue that, in the grand scheme of things, 6 emails is nothing to worry about – and indeed that’s true: the Delete button is a wonderful tool. But I feel there’s possibly a more important point to make here:

Should there be an unsubscribe button on internal communications emails?

UK email communications are subject to a 2002 EU directive on privacy and electronic communications:

  • The directive was brought into force in the UK by the Privacy and Electronic Communications ( EC Directive) Regulations 2003
  • The regulations apply to all organisations that send out marketing by telephone, fax, automated calling system, email, SMS , MMS or using any other form of electronic communication
  • The regs make distinctions between personal (joebloggs@hotmail.com) and corporate/company (joebloggs@company-email.com) subscribers
  • The regs state that an organisation can’t send unsolicited marketing communications by email to individual subscribers unless the recipient has given their prior consent

There’s a bit of a grey area here as to whether my email address is considered a company or individual one, but my question is: where did I ever give consent to be spammed by corporate comms?

Clearly the definition of spam is a vacuous one, but the principle remains that I haven’t opted-in (or indeed been given the option to opt-out) for any kind of messaging from a self-absorbed internal comms team.

I personally can safely say that each and every email I’ve ever received from a comms team has been deleted. At BEST they’re of zero interest. At WORST (which is 99% of the time) they just get in the way and are a distraction.

Have you ever received a really good internal comms message that’s inspired and motivated you? Does that message from the CEO really touch your emotional core and tug on your heartstrings? Or have all yours also been total balls?

All comments & opinions appreciated.

(thanks to Out-Law for the various email marketing law info!)

Google’s spam team still operational, slap Aviva for dodgy link-building

There’s been speculation recently as to whether Google actually pay attention to dodgy link-building tactics. eConsultancy carried a fairly damning article that implied the Google spam team weren’t paying attention – and judging by the articles, it was true…

A bit of recent digging revealed that maybe the spam team have just been held up whilst sifting through the weird link-building campaign that Aviva have been embarking on. Admittedly, this could also be the ‘Caffeine’ update coming into effect, but the evidence is a bit…damning, frankly.

Last week, Aviva were ranked #2 in Google’s natural SERPs for ‘Life insurance’ – a coveted and popular search term, up there with ‘car insurance’ and the like – second only to Money Super Market (who, let’s face it, will probably be dominant for insurance-based search terms until hell freezes over).

As of today, though, Aviva are not even on the first page.

The reason? A quick check through Yahoo Site Explorer reveals inbound links from noted and respected life insurance authority sites such as:

Nice work! A quick squint through those pages reveals links dropped into the content that’s is (in my personal opinion) quite clearly there purely for search engine gaming. Perhaps there’s hope for spam detection yet…?

Twitter: the new paid-for link service?

We’ve all heard recently about how Google & Microsoft are now indexing the Twitter-feed. Does this mean Twitter will become the future of paid-for links?

eConsultancy have raised an interesting point about this, and conclude that it’s gonna be hard to distinguish between valuable links tweeted vs those that are paid for.

Quite frankly, I predict at least one outcome – a surge in Twitter-spam: a huge influx of those ridiculous accounts called ‘Maryjane410′ (or whatever) who simply Tweet bot-driven spammy bollocks. Hurrah.